Comments on:

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FORENSIC SCIENCE

Views of the Commission

Statistical Statements in Forensic Testimony

http://forensic-evaluation.net/NCFS_Statistical_Statements_in_Forensic_Testimony/

last update: 10 April 2017

July – September 2016

• Initial Draft Views Document on Statistical Statements in Forensic Testimony - DOJ-LA-2016-0018-0005
  
  
  
• Comment by G S Morrison 2016-09-13
  
  
  
• Comments by others:
  
  
  • T Hunt 2016-09-07
    
    
  • C Crouse 2016-09-13
    
    
  • C E H Berger 2016-09-26
    
    
  • American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors 2016-09-29
    
    

November 2016 – January 2017

• Initial Draft Views Document on Statistical Statements in Forensic Testimony - DOJ-LA-2016-0025-0001
  
  
  
• Comment by G S Morrison 2017-01-04
  
  
  
• Comments by others:
  
  
  • T Hunt 2017-01-04
    
    
  • W Loomis 2017-01-05
    
    
  • J Wetstein 2017-01-05
    
    
  • C Crouse 2017-01-08
    
    
  • S Graham 2017-01-25
    
    
  • V Weedn 2017-01-25
    
    
  • National District Attorneys Association 2017-01-26
    
    

February – March 2017

• Draft Views Document on Statistical Statements in Forensic Testimony - DOJ-LA-2017-0004-0003
  
  
  
• Comments by others:
  
  
  • Anonymous 2017-02-22
    
    
  • M Schiro 2017-02-22
    
    
  • R Hanson 2017-02-24
    
    
  • M Hays 2017-02-24
    
    
  • J Chappell 2017-02-27
    
    
  • J Kunkel 2017-02-27
    
    
  • M Triplett 2017-02-27
    
    
  • E Ray 2017-03-01
    
    
  • J Chappell 2017-02-27
    
    
  • T Ringfield 2017-03-01
    
    
  • S Cole 2017-03-07
    
    
  • T Hunt 2017-03-17
    
    
    
    

March 2017

April 2017

Additional ammendments to the document were discussed at the Commission meeting on 10 April 2017.


A vote on whether to approve the document was held.


The document did not obtain the 2/3 majority necessary to approve it as an official Commission document.